He was not only the last but the most perfect of the Romanticists. He was devoted to poetry and had no other interest. Unlike Wordsworth who was interested in reforming poetry and upholding the moral law; unlike Shelley who advocated impossible reforms and prophesied about the golden age; and unlike Byron who made poetry a vehicle of his strongly egoistical nature and political discontents of the time; unlike Coleridge who was a metaphysician and had philosophical concerns; and unlike Scott who relished in story telling, Keats did not take much notice of the social, political and literary turmoils, but devoted himself entirely to the worship of beauty, and writing poetry as it suited his temperament.
John Keats Critical Analysis of Keats's "Ode on a Grecian Urn" To Keats, the Urn stands in a special sacred relation to a special kind of existence and keeps this relation immaculate and intact.
The Urn is a concrete symbol of some vast reality which can be reached only through a knowledge of individual objects which share and reflect its character. There are, Keats says, beyond the reach of fate, somethings which deserve a religious respect and devotion and belong to the essential elements of the world.
These things are "silent as a consecrated urn. There are times marked in the natural order of the universe when these powers keep state, and it is then that we must get into touch with them and see what they have to reveal.
His ideal world was not a scheme of abstractions but of a source of living powers beyond the senses, and therefore silent, but more real than the most entrancing gifts of the senses through the devotion which it commands and the assurance with which he believes that it endures forever.
Great art can't but suggest something beyond its immediate or even its remoter meanings, an indefinable "other", which is the most important thing it has to give. In our apprehension and enjoyment of this, we almost forget the details of an actual work of art and pass beyond them into a state which may be called silence because it speaks not to the ear but to the spirit.
If we feel this in reading poetry, we can imagine how much more keenly Keats felt it in writing. In his inspired moments of composition, he sought to give expression in audible and musical words to that other indefinite and yet more powerful music which makes what it is.
Keats notion of silence is combined with his notion of time which indeed receives fuller attention, as if it were even more important, and so perhaps it is. The paradox of all art is that it gives permanence to fleeting moments and fixes them in an unchanging form.
Thus, with this idea Keats is in part concerned and his ideal Urn embodies it. Preserved and sanctified by time, it keeps its original freshness and appeal nor is its permanence cold and inhuman.
The work of art has its own life which is more vivid than the actual life on which Keats touches in the third stanza. The timelessness of his achievement is a true reflection of something known to artists when they work at the highest pitch of inspiration.
In the act of creation, when all faculties are harmoniously at work together, time does not so much stand still as vanish. The artist is not conscious of it because he is caught in an activity so absorbing that it is complete in itself, with no sense of before and after.
Keats expresses his willingness to leave his own special approach to experience through the imagination for something like philosophy and his refusal is based on the belief that the mystery of things can't be mastered by an act of will but forces us "out of thought," that is, from ordinary ways of thinking into the approach of the imagination.
By thought he means the discursive, puzzled, analytical activity of the intellect. Keats was concerned with the relations of truth and beauty, and how he developed his own theory about them.
This theory maybe expressed in something like the following form:Jul 14, · It is one of Shelley's greatest benjaminpohle.com has been called a 'matchless ode'.
But it is not easy to understand. The main difficulty in understanding the poem arises from the abundance of similes and metaphors which follow one another with an astonishing quickness.
A Critical Appreciation of the poem "To Autumn" by John Keats.
Topics: John Keats As far as it is known, we can claim that Ode to Autumn is the last one of the four. It is said that Ode to Read More. Words 6 Pages "Ode to a Nightingale" and "To Autumn" by John Keats. Summary of Ode to The West Wind – Stanza One.
In this Ode to West Wind summary we will discuss how Shelley observes the West Wind as a destroyer and a preserver. The poet sketches the picture of the West Wind as the breath of the season of autumn which flows through the .
The Critical Analysis of The Poem ―Ode to a Nightingale‖ by John Keats through Iser‘s Theory of the Act of Reading identifiable things such as the cool dew of an autumn day. In his poetry, Keats attempts identify and explore the beauty to common of "Ode to .
As opposed to Keats' "Ode on Melancholy", for example, this poem does not describe a quest or a challenge; rather, "To Autumn" is composed of quiet, staid musings on a beautiful season. Structurally, this poem is written in three eleven-line stanzas of rhyming iambic pentameter.
A Critical Appreciation of the poem “To Autumn” by John Keats Essay Sample The poem we are analyzing is called “To Autumn” by a poet named John Keats. The poem is .